-
Blog Stats
- 150,140 Hits
-
-
Top 5 Posts
-
a
Archives
-
Website Comments
- j on Way’s To Lose Money: IBD’s 20 Rules For Investment Success
- Jim Rogers on Chairman Bernanke and why the Fed Should Not Cut Interest Rates « FINANCIAL POLITICO on Warren Buffett and the Falling Dollar – Fortune Magazine
- Charlie on America’s 90% Tax Rate
- John on Big Oil Takes More Ignorant Abuse
- smrtas1 on Big Oil Takes More Ignorant Abuse
- Jack on Mohnish Pabrai DCF Calc
- Edward on Mohnish Pabrai DCF Calc
- Joe on The Value Investors Club
- Evan on Jim Cramer on Bear Stearns
- john on Jim Cramer on Bear Stearns
- Michael Santelli on The Pebble Mine-More than Just Pebbles?
- Gerbeel Haamster on Dominion Homes Takes Buyout Over Bankruptcy
- Roxanne Buchenberger on The Pebble Mine-More than Just Pebbles?
- john on America’s 90% Tax Rate
- Eric Schleien on America’s 90% Tax Rate
V A L U E S E E K E R . N E T- The Best Article Every day
- Unknown Feed
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Invest Bottom Up
ValueSeeker.net
-
-
Authors
Eric Schleien
zachary
teenmoney
josh4580
Carlton
Hey thanks man, I really like how it can incorporate share repurchases and it’s possible effect on share value.
This is a great framework – I would suggest one additional feature. Using only an exit multiple for terminal value may force one to rely on a relative value judgement (ie. where do other companies that also make widgets trade at).
It mat be additive to use a perpetual growth rate and back into the implied exit multiple. This way a user of the model can i) determine the long term going concern cash flow profile of an enterprise (benchmarked against say GDP growth) and ii) rationalize that assumption against an implied multiple.